Sunday, July 26, 2009

Un hacker affirme que le cryptage de l'iPhone 3GS est incroyablement facile à pirater

Le redoutable casseur de sécurités de l’iPhone Jonathan Zdziarski a cracké le système d’encryptage de l’iPhone 3GS, ce qui était prévisible.

Mais c’est la vitesse et la facilité avec lesquelles il y est parvenu qui est inquiétante, et Jonathan Zdziarski affirme que l’iPhone 3GS est en l’état “inutilisable” par les entreprises.

L’iPhone n’est certainement pas aussi répandu dans les entreprises que le BlackBerry ou même Windows Mobile, mais les choses ont commencé à changer, et Jonathan Zdziarski est très soucieux du fait que la sécurité de l’iPhone 3GS expose les données sensibles à des risques inutiles.

Il affirme qu’avec des logiciels faciles à se procurer, n’importe qui peut cracker un iPhone 3GS et commencer à en extraire des données en deux minutes, et disposer d’un accès total au téléphone en 45 minutes.

Après avoir lu ceci, vous comprendrez que certaines entreprises soient réticentes à échanger leurs BlackBerry contre un joli iPhone 3GS tout neuf. [Wired]




Gizmodo.fr

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Anna Schwartz: The Fed's Performance "Has been Disappointing"

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/06/anna-schwartz-the-feds-performance-has-been-disappointing.html

Monday, June 8, 2009

Electronical Protector!!!


Gizmodo.fr

A hacker, Jeff Moss alias Dark Tangent, is recruited by US's administration to protect electronically USA.

Sunday, June 7, 2009

កម្ពុជា​នឹង​មាន​កំណើនសេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ពី១% ទៅ២% សម្រាប់​ឆ្នាំ២០០៩

លោក ​រដ្ឋ​មន្ត្រី​ក្រ​សួង​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​និង​ហិរ​ញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ថា​ ប្រ​ទេស​កម្ពុជា​នឹង​ទទួល​បាន​កំ​ណើន​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​ក្នុង​រង្វង់​ពី​១​ទៅ​២%​ សម្រាប់​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៩។​​ ការ​ថម​ថយ​នេះ​គឺ​បណ្តាល​មក​ពី​វិ​បត្តិ​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​ពិភព​លោក​។

ប្រ​ទេស​កម្ពុជា​អាច​នឹង​ទទួល​បាន​កំណើន​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ឋ​ក្នុង​រង្វង់​ពី​១​ ទៅ​២%​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ​សម្រាប់​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៩​នេះ ​រីឯ​កាល​ពី​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៨​កន្លង​មក ​កំណើន​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​សម្រេច​បាន​ក្នុង​អត្រា​ជិត​៧%។​​​ នេះ​គឺជា​គូស​បញ្ជាក់​របស់​លោក​គាត​ ឈន់​ រដ្ឋមន្រ្តី​ក្រសួង​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​និង​ហិរ​ញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​ នៅ​ក្នុង​ឯក​សារ​ជំនួយ​ស្មារ​តី​របស់​លោក​។​

ឯក​សារ​ជំនួយ​ស្មា​រតី​ របស់​លោក​គាត ​ឈន់ ​ដែល​អ្នក​កា​សែត​ទើប​ទទួល​បាន​​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ថា ​​វិបត្តិ​ហិ​​រញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​ពិភព​លោក​បាន​បង្ក​ហា​និ​ភ័យ​មួយ​ចំនួន​ដល់​ ប្រព័ន្ធ​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​និង​ហិរញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​កម្ពុជា​ ជា​ពិ​សេស​ការ​ស្រុត​ចុះ​នៃ​ប្រភព​ហិរញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​ និង​លំ​ហូរ​ទុន​វិនិ​យោគ​ឯក​ជន។​

កាល​ពី​ពេល​កន្លង​មក ​ស្ថា​ប័ន​ហិរញ្ញ​វត្ថុ​អន្តរ​ជាតិ​មួយ​ចំនួន​ធ្លាប់​បាន​ទស្សន៍ទាយ​ថា​ ​​ដោយ​សារ​វិបត្តិ​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​ពិភព​លោក ​​កម្ពុជា​នឹង​មិន​ទទួល​បាន​កំណើន​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​នោះ​ទេ​សម្រាប់​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៩​ នេះ​។ អ្នក​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​មួយ​ចំនួន​បាន​វាយ​តម្លៃ​ថា​ ​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៩​គឺ​ជា​ឆ្នាំ​ដែល​ប្រ​ទេស​កម្ពុជា​ប្រ​ឈម​ខ្លាំង​ជាង​គេ​។​​​​​

លោក ​គាត ​​ឈន់ ​បាន​បន្ត​ក្នុង​ឯក​សារ​ជំនួយ​ស្មារតី​របស់​លោក​ថា​ ​វិស័យ​ដែល​ទទូល​រង​ផល​ប៉ះ​ពាល់​ខ្លាំង​ជាង​គេ​ គឺ​វិ​ស័យ​កាត់​ដេរ ​​វិ​ស័យ​ទេស​ចរណ៍ ​វិស័យ​សំណង់​ និង​វិ​ស័យ​អច​លន​ទ្រព្យ។​ ប៉ុន្តែ​លោក​មិន​បាន​បញ្ជាក់​លម្អិត​ពី​ទម្ងន់​នៃ​ផល​ប៉ះ​ពាល់​នោះ​ទេ​។​

លោក ​ជា​ មុន្នី ​ប្រ​ធាន​សហ​ជីព​សេរី​កម្មករ ​នៃ​ព្រះ​រា​ជា​ណា​ចក្រ​កម្ពុជា ​ធ្លាប់​បាន​ប្រាប់​អោយ​ដឹង​ថា​ៈ​ ចាប់​តាំង​ពី​មាន​វិ​បត្តិ​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​មក​ កម្មករ​ប្រ​មាណ​ជា​៤​ម៉ឺន​នាក់​បាន​បាត់​បង់​ការ​ងារ​ ក្នុង​វិ​ស័យ​កាត់​ដេរ​។​​ កម្មករ​មួយ​ចំនួន​បាន​វិល​ត្រ​លប់​ទៅ​ស្រុក​កំ​ណើត​វិញ ​រីឯ​មួយ​ចំនួន​ទៀត​ បាន​ប្តូរ​មុខ​របរ​។​

ទាក់​ទង​នឹង​វិ​ស័យ​ទេស​ ចរណ៍ ​លោក​ហូ​ វ៉ាន់ឌី​ អតីត​ប្រ​ធាន​ស​មាគម​ទី​ភ្នាក់​ងារ​វិ​ស័យ​ទេស​ចរណណ៍កម្ពុជា​ បាន​អោយ​ដឹង​ថា​ ដោយ​សារ​វិបត្តិ​សេដ្ឋ​កិច្ច​ សណ្ឋា​គារ​ នៅ​ក្នុង​ខេត្ត​សៀម​រាប​​ប្រមាណ​ជា​១០​ត្រូវ​បាន​បិទ​ទ្វារ​ ឬ​ផ្អាក​សកម្ម​ភាព​មួយ​រយៈ​សិន​។​​ លោក​បាន​បន្ត​ទៀត​ថា​ ​​ភ្ញៀវ​ទេសចរ​មក​ទស្សនា​អង្គរ​វត្ត​មាន​ការ​ថយ​ចុះ​ច្រើន​ បើ​ទោះ​បី​តួ​លេខ​ថ្នាក់​ជាតិ​មាន​ការ​ថយ​ចុះ​តិច​តួច​ក៏​ដោយ​។​

​​ ចំពោះ​វិស័យ​សំ​ណង់ ​និង​វិស័យ​អច​លន​ទ្រព្យ​ អ្នក​ជំ​នាញ​មួយ​ចំ​នួន​បាន​និ​យាយ​ថា ​សកម្ម​ភាព​វិនិយោគ​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​នេះ​មួយ​ចំនួន​បាន​ផ្អាក​សកម្ម​ភាព​។​​​

​ បើ​ទោះ​បី​ជា​វិស័យ​មួយ​ចំនួន​កំពុង​រង​ផល​ប៉ះ​ពាល់​ពី​វិ​បត្តិ​សេដ្ឋ​ កិច្ច​ពិភព​លោក​ក៏​ដោយ​ ក៏​​វិស័យ​ទូរគមនា​គមន៍​ហាក់​បី​ដូច​ជា​កំពុង​រីក​លូត​លាស់​ទៅ​វិញ​​។ របាយ​ការណ៍​របស់​កម្ម​វិធី​អភិ​វឌ្ឍន៍​សហ​ប្រជា​ជាតិ ​ហៅ​កាត់​ថា​ UNDP ​បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ថា ​វិស័យ​ទូរ​គម​នា​គមន៍​បាន​កើន​ឡើង​៣០%​ជា​រៀង​រាល់​ឆ្នាំ​ក្នុង​រយៈ​ពេល​៥​ ឆ្នាំ​ចុង​ក្រោយ​នេះ​។​​

លោក​គាត ​ឈន់ ​បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ក្នុង​ឯក​សារ​ជំ​នួយ​ស្មា​រតី​របស់​លោក​ថា​ ​រាជ​រដ្ឋាភិ​បាល​បាន​នឹង​កំពុង​ចាត់​វិ​ធាន​ការណ៍​សម្រួល​ពន្ធ​អាករ​លើ​ទំ​ និញ​មួយ​ចំនួន​ និង​លើក​លែង​ពន្ធ​លើ​ប្រាក់​ចំ​ណេញ​សម្រាប់​ការ​វិ​និ​យោគ​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​មួយ​ ចំនួន​

By Ky Soklim (Radio France International-FRI)


​​​

Slow Start Expected for New Bourse

Asking if it’s wise to launch Cambodia’s first stock exchange during an economic crisis is missing the point, according to key figures behind the country’s proposed bourse.

WHEN the opening bell rang on the first day of trading at the Ho Chi Minh Securities Trading Centre on July 28, 2000, just two companies were listed. From the outset, trading was a muted process.

"It takes time - in the case of Vietnam, it took five years [to gather momentum]," says Hang Chuon Naron, secretary general at the Ministry of Economy and Finance, which is overseeing development of Cambodia's first bourse.

The ministry is using the Vietnamese exchange as an influence, he adds, meeting regularly with Vietnamese State Securities Commission officials for advice.

The government has tied itself to an end-of-year launch for its bourse, leading the press to ask repeatedly whether it will be ready on time, and if it is wise to launch in the middle of an economic downturn.

Given the evolutionary nature of stock exchanges, government officials and financial analysts say the press have largely missed the point.

"There is no such thing as a right time or a wrong time," says Sam Ghanty, a US-trained Cambodian financial expert who has worked at Canadia Bank and Foreign Trade Bank. "I agree with some concerns, [but] when is the right time?"
Foreign investors in Cambodia seem to agree that getting the ball rolling remains a priority for Cambodia's embryonic exchange.

"People have asked if it makes sense to try to open a new stock exchange at a time when global markets are in disarray," investment fund Leopard Capital said in its May newsletter. "Our view is that since it will probably take a few years for the new exchange to get traction anyway, the earlier they start that process the better."

The Korea Exchange (KRX) - which is providing technical assistance to develop the exchange, of which it will have a 45 percent stake - took decades to develop from its original form, notes Hang Chuon Naron.

The more pertinent question, analysts say, should be: "Is Cambodia ready?"
"There's a lot of work that needs to be done," admits Hang Chuon Naron.


Since it will probably take a few years ... the earlier they start that process the better ...


For a start, construction of the four-storey, US$6 million structure planned to house the bourse won't begin until November at the earliest, says Duk-kon Kim, vice president of the project management team at World City Co Ltd, the South Korean company that is finalising designs for the exchange at its Phnom Penh satellite town Camko City.

He adds that the building - with the exchange itself on the first floor - will not be finished until "August or September next year". A further three months of "commissioning and testing" will also be required, he says.

So even though the joint-venture stock exchange company will be inaugurated this year, Hang Chuon Naron says trading will not kick off until the end of 2010 at the earliest.

In the meantime, creating an exchange in Cambodia - a country that has only recently familiarised itself with commercial banking - "needs a few ingredients", Ghanty says.

While the government has passed a series of laws preparing the country for bonds and securities trading, legislation-wise there is still a way to go.

"Additional work remains to clarify, among other things, accounting, auditing, and corporate governance rules and regulations, and to establish tax benefits for listed companies," Leopard Capital said last month.

Clean-up required

As Ghanty points out, Cambodian companies have had a tendency towards opaque bookkeeping well below international standards. He acknowledges that in many cases it will be difficult to get most companies in the Kingdom to adhere to transparent auditing and accounting practices in an economic climate that generally dictates that "I will do whatever I have to do to maximise profit".

It has mainly been the banking sector that has abided by such standards, he adds, employing international accounting and auditing firms including KPMG and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. He predicts that these may form the second wave of exchange listings once the exchange is up and running.

With three state-owned companies tipped to list first - Electricite du Cambodge, Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority and Sihanoukville Autonomous Port, the Post understands - they must be ready to go ahead before the exchange can be launched, both in terms of accounting standards and confidence given the economic climate.

"You have to give incentives to companies to be listed," says Hang Chuon Naron. "Why do they want capital? They want to expand."

On the scale of the economy as a whole, KRX Project Director Inpyo Lee says the benefits include - among others - raising the stature of the Kingdom in the eyes of the international business community as an investment destination.

"It [the exchange] can bring transparency to the Cambodian economy," he says.

But it's not just the domestic and international private sector that matters, nor the government. For the exchange to benefit the economy, it must also engage the general population.

"You have to create a new culture," Sam Ghanty says.

Given that any exchange takes time to gain momentum, Hang Chuon Naron is predicting that the stock exchange is unlikely to represent a primary source for raising capital in the short term.

"In the next 10 years, the Cambodian financial sector will be dominated by the banks," he says. "It [the stock exchange] won't be able to play a fully fledged role as a mode of finance for a number of years."

And it's not just answers to the questions of timing and development that the creators of Cambodia's exchange can find in Vietnam.

Despite the slow evolution of the Ho Chi Min City exchange, by 2006 it had begun to overheat and the failure of the Vietnamese authorities to use measures to curb the boom made inevitable the slide that followed.

That's the number one lesson Cambodia has taken from Vietnam, Hang Chuon Naron says. "Your regulator has to know when to step in," he says. "When there is a bubble, you have to take away...incentives."

In the short term, at least, Cambodia's fledgling stock exchange is unlikely to require the authorities to put the brakes on.

Written by Steve Finch (Phnom Penh Post)

Généreuse Corée!!!!!!!!!

La Cambodge vient de se voir accorder 60 millions de dollars de prêts par la Corée du Sud. Ces fonds doivent servir à construire des routes, aménager la rivière et rénover les égouts de Siem Reap.

Pour Hor Nam Hong, ministre des Affaires étrangères, il s'agit là d'un grand succès pour le Premier Ministre, qui revient juste d'une visite officielle en Corée du Sud. Ce voyage a permis la signature de sept accords et MOU entre les deux pays. Profitant de l'occasion, Phnom Penh a également demandé de nouveaux prêts à hauteur de 300 millions de dollars pour financer le développement des infrastructures à travers le royaume. Une requête que Séoul est en train d'étudier.

Le président sud-coréen Lee Myung Bak a déclaré dans un communiqué officiel que son pays souhaitait aider le Cambodge dans les domaines de l'agriculture, de la santé et de l'éducation. Hun Sen a par ailleurs évoqué une collaboration visant à introduire un système boursier (marché boursier?) dans le pays et développer ainsi les marchés financiers.

Phnom Penh et Séoul ont rétabli leurs relations diplomatiques en 1997, après une interruption survenue en 1975 avec l'arrivée au pouvoir des Khmers rouges. Ces derniers temps, plusieurs entreprises coréennes ont investi et se sont installées au Cambodge.



Par Cambodge Soir.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

A Prefix A Day!

Arch- : main, chief, prinicipal

Arch-enemy : a chief enemy
Arch-rival : a main rival
Arch-etype : 1-the original pattern or model from which all other things of the same type are
made; 2-a perfect example of a type or group.

Participated in the mourning for President Roh Moo-Hyun!

Saturday, May 23, 2009

A few days in Lao PDR!














Let's come and see this relaxing and beautiful country!!!!

Saturday, May 9, 2009

A Prefix A Day!

Ambi-: both, around

Ambi-dextrous (adj.): using both hands with equal ease
Ambi-ance (n.): a surrounding or pervading atmosphere; environment
Ambi-guous (adj.): capable of being understood in two or more ways
Ambi-t (n.): circuit, compass; a sphere of action or influence
Ambi-vert (n.): a person like both an extrovert and introvert

Happy Holiday !

Happy Holidays to all friends in Cambodia. I hope they all will profit from their free time to relax.
Don't live to work but work to live.

Best wishes from Salakrong!!!!!

Thursday, May 7, 2009

One Prefix A Day!

ad-

ad-here (v.): to stick to
ad-journ (v.): to suspend a session; to move to another place

Reflections on the chronology of the financial crisis

By Roger M. Kubarych

The financial crisis is not over but it seems less scary since the US stock market decided that most big banks will survive. This column provides a current scoreboard of the crisis game and reminds everybody that the underlying problems are hardly resolved. A lot of banks sorely need capital and need to raise it relatively cheaply.

The financial crisis is not over but it has seemed less scary in the weeks since the US stock market decided that most big banks will survive. But before we get complacent, don’t forget how far the market has gone down (basically it lost almost half its peak value) and how little the net bounce has been; year-to-date, the S&P 500 is still lower. That compares to +20% in Brazil, +25% in Venezuela, and +40% in Russia and China, just to pick out a few big winners.

Instead, some eye-opening numbers should remind everybody that the underlying problems are hardly resolved:

  • mortgages securitised by Wall Street (in so-called “private label” mortgage-backed securities, (MBS)) represent 16% of all mortgages, but over 50% of seriously delinquent mortgages
  • distressed sales accounted for a formidable 45% of all existing home sales
  • average home prices are down 32% from their peak

Here’s a current scorecard of this dismal game, which started in February 2007. We’re still only in the top of the fifth inning (just before half-time of a European football match).

Who caused the meltdown and where they stand today?

· Underlying borrowers were reckless. Now they’re preoccupied with surviving the recession. So those who can borrow don’t want to, while those who want to often can’t.

· Loan originators (Countrywide, New Century Financial, GMAC, Household/HSBC, et al) and securitisers (Lehman, Merrill, Citi, Mgn Stanley, Bear) were complicit. Now several of the big originators are either defunct, like New Century; merged, like Countrywide into BofA; or for sale, like Household. Same for the securitisers (fill in the blanks).

· Ratings agencies were conflicted. Now they are vindictive (and scared of being put out of business).

· Buy side was lazy and cheap; lazy, because they didn’t do their own due diligence on complex securities such as collateralised debt obligations; cheap, because they didn’t hire objective experts to advise them. Instead like lemmings they followed the ratings over the cliff. Now they’re ashamed of how gullible they were and distrustful of Wall St.

· Money was too easy and too readily available for too long. Now it is appropriately easy but not readily available.

· Everybody was taking on too much leverage. Now everybody is trying to deleverage at the same time, which is impossible and makes the crisis drag on.

· The Fed closed its eyes, while the SEC had given a nearly blank check to the entire investment banking industry to go to extremes. Now they duck accountability while blaming all of the above.

· Regulators were clueless in other ways (proven conclusively by the Madoff scandal) and politicians were living up to their reputations. Now regulators aren’t sure what role they should play; as tough enforcers or as genteel partners. And Congress is happy just to hold hearings and make people squirm.

After the financial meltdown came the Great Unraveling (the almost inevitable sequel to the ill-named Great Moderation), characterised by deleveraging.

The horrors of deleveraging

The sell side (meaning the main investment banks and investment banking divisions of big commercial banks, known in Europe as “universal banks”) didn’t understand the MBS/CDOs any better than their customers and thus, believed their own sales pitches and bought too much of their own product, and didn’t pay much attention to their sales contracts which often gave clients the right to put the securities back to them, and underestimated how fiercely those deceived buy side clients could and would strike back.

The Fed either misunderstood how the financial system was working or knew but decided to try to cover it all up. (The BofA chairman Ken Lewis’s remarks to NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s interrogation that Paulson and Bernanke urged him not to disclose huge Merrill Lynch shareholders because they feared it would mutilate the whole system are instructive.) Incidentally, the Fed’s calling it just a liquidity crisis in the fall of 2007, at a time when CEOs were getting fired (Merrill’s O’Neal, Citi’s Prince, & others) was and is baffling. CEOs don’t get fired for liquidity problems.

The global dimensions of what was unfolding were initially ignored. Then we had BNP Paribas restricting fund redemptions, IKB and Sachsen Landesbank failing in Germany, Northern Rock imploding in Britain, and even UBS getting scalded.

Policy responses

The Fed went from providing liquidity to providing lender of last resort assistance (via the Term Auction Facility, TAF, essentially the anonymous discount window), to becoming intermediary of first resort (commercial paper financing facility, e.g.) to ending up creating the mother of all maturity mismatches through the mortgage-backed securities buying binge– which the Fed Chairman admits won’t be unwound (actually it can be, but the losses that would probably be involved would shock even the Fed’s most dependable apologists).

Treasury went from capitalist to socialist in three easy steps; marriage broker for Bear Stearns – JPMorgan Chase, saviour of Fannie and Freddie, rescuer of AIG -- and thus protector of the biggest derivatives counterparties through the TARP. [The execution of Lehman was a brief, ill-conceived diversion.)

What options are still on the table?

Geithner’s latest gambit, call it Son of TARP, is announced but far from implemented; It is incredible the number of commentators, some very famous, who lump together the two totally separate programs he proposed. They are very different. One is sensible, the other is questionable:

· The legacy loan program could work. We could call it the Return of Standard Credit Card Trust (the first successful securitisation outside mortgages, developed by a troubled Citibank in 1988 in order to retain its profitable credit card business by securitising credit card receivables. Since then every big bank has done the same.) What could make it work are these features; the FDIC’s deep (for now) pockets to provide leverage; its willingness to do due diligence, so only the better loans get the full 6:1 leverage; auctions that could work because banks can withdraw if bidders bid too low; and, best of all, a fine objective, liquefying illiquid loans (forget whether they are “distressed” or not) that will improve capital ratios.

· Legacy securities program is unlikely to be a big success. Once again it demonstrates the dangers of well-meaning, but hastily devised schemes. Why unlikely to be successful; Selecting a “Fab 5” of firms to buy and manage toxic securities, but with the taxpayer taking the vast majority of the economic risk was a recipe for taxpayer indignation. And it could have led to collusion among the “Fab 5”. Treasury seems to have figured this out and now says it is prepared to take on more bond managers but the most likely Fab 5 candidates may in the meantime be getting cold feet. But prodding banks to sell securities and force realised losses – that is not going to be easy unless the US Treasury is intent on putting them out of business or forcing mergers with other institutions.

Some suggestions

Sensible ideas abound, not least by Lynn Tilton (not as famous Bill Gross or Peter Fisher, but she’s been in the middle of toxicity for decades) as interviewed by Lauren Tara LaCapra in TheStreet.com. Also University of Chicago Finance Professor Luigi Zingales has published a number of widely-circulated, promising suggestions, too.

Unblocking markets in which buyers see huge downside risks that sellers don’t is not easy. Somebody has to step in and provide options contracts that give sellers a clear upside potential if they are right (but have to sell to keep their government bail-out money) and somebody has to insure a portion of the downside risk so that the buyers will bid more for toxic, illiquid securities. That somebody is the taxpayer. But taxpayers have to be rewarded more generously than the Geithner plan.

The alternative is to buy time; keep delaying implementation of the legacy securities program, cross your fingers, and hope that the housing market stabilises sooner than feared. When foreclosures stop climbing and then start to inch even a little lower, there will be a huge sigh of relief and the CDO market will gradually unfreeze. That’s why the foreclosure prevention program tucked into the Obama stimulus package is still the most important ingredient. And why state and local governments deserve help in buying foreclosed properties before they are boarded up and spoil whole neighbourhoods.

In the meantime, by all means implement the legacy loan program and help a lot of banks raise some sorely needed capital relatively cheaply. Also:

  • Declare a temporary capital gains holiday for incremental purchases of equities, because without a sustained stock market rally, consumers have no alternative but to lift their savings rates. And that will prolong the recession, stunt the recovery, and maybe even trigger a “double-dip.”
  • Introduce competence exams for key board members of systemically important banks (at least the chairs of the three key board committees; audit, compensation, and risk evaluation). Newly hired 26 year olds have to pass pretty tough tests. How much more important is it for members of boards of directors to know the material cold?
  • Scale back too big and/or too interconnected to fail institutions through divestitures.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

ASEAN ministers meet on economic crisis

Hundreds of billions of dollars in crisis-fighting funds from G20 and ASEAN discussed at economic meeting in Siem Reap

ECONOMIC ministers from the 10 ASEAN-member states met in Siem Reap Monday and Tuesday to formulate economic strategies to alleviate the worst effects of the global economic crisis in the region.

During the two-day Economic Ministers' Retreat, chaired by ASEAN Deputy Secretary General Sundram Pushpanathan and Cambodia's Commerce Minister Cham Prasidh, member states debated how they would absorb a US$370 billion emergency currency swap fund jointly organised by the G20 and ASEAN nations.

"We discussed our strategy to deal with the crisis and help each other, especially ASEAN members who are facing serious problems," said Sok Sopheak, director general of the Ministry of Commerce. He said the fund - made up of $250 billion from the G20 nations and $120 billion from the ASEAN countries, China, Japan and South Korea - would allow member states to borrow money to bolster their economies in the face of the worsening global crisis.

Fighting the downturn
Ministers also discussed reducing the impact of the economic crisis by bringing representatives from the private sector to the table.

The billions in assistance would focus on small and medium-sized enterprises, and companies involved in export and import.
Sok Sopheak said Cambodia's exports had fallen due to the global economic crisis and that the construction and tourism sectors had also seen a drop-off.

"Whenever we understand that we are facing huge problems, we raise the proposal to borrow funds based on criteria that have been stated in the policy," he said.


We discussed our strategy to deal with the crisis and help each other.


Mao Thora, secretary of state at the Minsitry of Commerce, said ASEAN trade ministers would also put together a long-term plan to adopt the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint, a European Union-style system combining a common currency and unrestricted trade between member states.

But he said that ASEAN should concentrated on freeing up the flow of people and goods between states rather than breaking down borders altogether.

Nguon Meng Tech, director general of the Cambodia Chamber of Commerce, agreed that the private sector would benefit from the development of closer trade and investment links between ASEAN countries.

Written by Kay Kimsong
Phnom Penh Post
Wednesday, 06 May 2009

Regional Economic Outlook: Asia and Pacific

Today, IMF issued its annual report on Asia and Pacific. The region was resilient to the financial crisis. However, the region is not immune to protracted economic downturn.

For further reading:
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/2009/apd/eng/areo0509.htm

Commitment to creating a blog!

After chatting with a friend of mine, I decided to move expeditiously to create a blog as a forum to share ideas, experiences, .....innovative ideas. I hope.

While trying my best to make the blog as lively as possible, your contributions, friends, such as comments, critiques...will, I believe, help me to improve my virtual house.

Funkykhmer

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

The First Global Financial Crisis of the 21st Century Part II: June – December, 2008

By: Andrew Felton Carmen M. Reinhart

A second compilation of Vox columns dealing with the ongoing crisis, in three parts: How did the crisis spread around the world? How has the crisis upended traditional thinking about financial economics? How should we fix the economy and financial system?

http://www.voxeu.org/reports/reinhart_felton_vol2/First_Global_Crisis_Vol2.pdf